As I understand it, the Court wasn’t ruling on the policy merits of the climate regulations. They simply said that regulations that eliminate and radically alter whole industries have to be explicitly authorized by a statute passed by congress. The policy merits aren’t (and shouldn’t be) within the Court’s purview when evaluating existing law.
As I understand it, the Court wasn’t ruling on the policy merits of the climate regulations. They simply said that regulations that eliminate and radically alter whole industries have to be explicitly authorized by a statute passed by congress. The policy merits aren’t (and shouldn’t be) within the Court’s purview when evaluating existing law.